« Back to my Constitutional Reform Index
Summary of the Constitutional Council model
Introduction
The Constitutional Council model
reconciles the two main republican camps the "minimalists" and the "direct
electionists". Public opinion is clearly and consistently in favour
of popular election of the Head of State, and we need to be able to tell
the public that they will be able to vote for the Head of State.
One of the major sticking points in popular election models has been that
a popularly elected Head of State would also exercise the reserve powers;
whilst one of the major sticking points in models providing for a Head
of State appointed by the Parliament, or by an electoral college (appointment
committee) or by the Prime Minister is that the people would not elect
the Head of State. However, under present arrangements, the Head
of State (the Queen) does not exercise the reserve powers, yet the person
who does exercise the reserve powers (the Governor-General) is appointed.
In other words, under current arrangements, the Head of State and the reserve
powers are decoupled, yet republicans seem to be blinkered by a
misconception that under a republican model the Head of State and the reserve
powers must be coupled, with a President (elected or not) exercising
the reserve powers.
This model provides for popular
election of a President who, like the Queen, does not exercise the reserve
powers. The model neatly combines the best elements of the existing
constitutional arrangements and those of the most popular republican models,
including the ultra-minimalist, minimalist (i.e., election by special parliamentary
majority), electoral college and directly elected non-executive President
models. It might sound like it would have to be complicated to achieve
this, but it's surprisingly simple, surprisingly effective and -
hopefully - surprisingly attractive.
The President and the Constitutional
Council
This model proposes a President
as Head of State to replace the Queen and the Governor-General. A
Constitutional Council would consist of five directly elected "full" members
(these members have a vote on the Constitutional Council) and four ex
officio "associate" members (the Speaker, the immediate past Speaker,
the immediate past President and the the immediate past Vice-President
) (these members do not have a vote on the Constitutional Council), and
one of these full members would be the President. The model provides
for two options regarding how the President is chosen from amongst these
full members - either the Constitutional Council elects one
if its full members to be President, or the full member receiving the highest
popular vote would automatically become President. One member would
also be similarly chosen to be the Vice-President. The Constitutional
Council also appoints the Speaker (see below under the heading "The Speaker").
The President (as Head of State) and the Constitutional Council (severally or jointly) would perform a mainly ceremonial and symbolic role. The President, with the consent of the Constitutional Council, may send bills back to the Parliament for reconsideration once, (a power also enjoyed but never exercised by the Governor-General), but he has no power to veto bills (a power, incidentally, which the Queen currently enjoys but has never exercised). The President retains none of the reserve powers - these are now exercised by the Speaker. The President and the Constitutional Council are entitled to be advised, to encourage and to warn.
All powers and functions of the President are, like the Governor-General, subject to due regard being had to constitutional conventions, and with the exception of powers or functions expressly vested in the President by the Constitution, powers or functions vested in the President can (unless otherwise provided) only be exercised or performed in accordance with the advice of the Federal Executive Council.
For the President and the Constitutional
Council:
Term: 6 years.
Eligibility: Same
as for House of Representatives, but can't be an MP or a member of a political
party.
Nomination: 1000 nominators.
Nominators may be anyone eligible to vote for the House of Representatives.
Appointment: Constitutional
Council is directly elected. Under option A, the Constitutional Councillor
achieving the highest vote becomes the President. Under option B,
the Constitutional Council chooses one of its number to be President.
Removal: 2/3 resolution
of both Houses.
Casual vacancy on Constitutional
Council: Counting back method used to determine who fills the
vacancy.
Casual vacancy in office of
President: Vice-President.
The Speaker
The Speaker - not the
President - would assume the reserve powers now exercisable
by the Governor-General whilst continuing to be the presiding officer of
the House of Representatives. A number of the remaining non-reserve
powers currently exercisable by the Governor-General or the Governor-General
in Council would, under this model, be exercisable directly by the Prime
Minister or the Federal Executive Council.
Thus, the office of Speaker is reformed to be a more independent, non-partisan office, with the Speaker nominated by the present or any past Speaker, by any past or present Prime Minister, by the Leader of the Opposition, or by any five M.P.s. The Constitutional Council would then elect a Speaker from amongst these candidates. The method of nomination and appointment would enable candidates of similar calibre, aptitude and respectability to that of the Governor-General to be selected for the office of Speaker. The Speaker could be dismissed by the Constitutional Council at its discretion, but only upon a resolution requesting the same by the House of Representatives. A full list of powers of the President, the Constitutional Council, the Speaker and the Federal Executive Council appears below.
The bonus of this model is that not only does the question of codification or exercise of reserve powers by an elected President not present a problem (as the reserve powers would not be exercisable by a popularly elected President who could claim to have a competing mandate against the Prime Minister), but that the office of Speaker is depoliticised, as all reasonable people would agree it should be, restoring some dignity to, and respect for, the House of Representatives and its members..
Recognising that the Speaker may at times be attending to other matters, a new office of Chancellor of the House of Representatives is created. The Chancellor would simply preside over the House of Representatives when the Speaker (or a deputy of the Speaker) is not available to preside (much like a deputy of the Speaker), and would be elected in the same way as the Speaker is elected under current constitutional arrangements. The Chancellor does not exercise any powers or functions of the Speaker apart from this, and in particular, the Chancellor does not exercise the reserve powers.
Powers of the Speaker include powers to appoint and dismiss the Prime Minister, dissolve the House of Representatives, dismiss the Chancellor, issue writs for elections for the House of Representatives, summon the Parliament and convene joint sittings, and recommend appropriation bills to Parliament.
For the Speaker:
Term: 5 years.
Eligibility: Same
as for House of Representatives, but can't be an MP or a member of a political
party.
Nomination: Incumbent
or past Speaker, incumbent or past Prime Minister, incumbent Leader of
the Opposition, any five MPs.
Appointment: Constitutional
Council chooses the Speaker from the list of candidates.
Removal: By Constitutional
Council following 2/3 resolution of the House of Representatives.
Casual vacancy: Deputy
Speaker.
The reserve powers
Reserve powers constitute
certain discretionary powers which, under current arrangements, may be
exercised by the Governor-General. The reserve powers of the Governor-General
include the following:
Providing for review by
the Constitutional Council of the exercise of the reserve powers by the
Speaker
The draft Constitutional Council
model constitutions, as presented on this web site, provide for the exercise
of the reserve powers by the Speaker, and the exercise of these reserve
powers is not subject to review. Under current arrangements, in practice,
the exercise of these reserve powers by the Governor-General is similarly
not subject to review, although monarchists would disingenuously suggest
that the Queen plays some role as a "backstop" by checking, reviewing or
limiting the powers of the Governor-General. This was tested in 1975
when the Speaker requested intervention from the Queen following the sacking
of Gough Whitlam as Prime Minister, and the Queen replied that it was improper
for her to intervene. Note that the original section 59, though never
invoked, empowers the Queen to disallow laws.
However, should it be considered desirable to do so, it is easy to provide an extra check on the reserve powers of the Speaker by allowing the Constitutional Council act as a "backstop" to review and annul such acts. I'd suggest that in order to discourage frivolous use of this review and annulment power it should be made quite difficult for the Constitutional Council to act by:
The Prime Minister and
the Federal Executive Council
The Prime Minister is the Head
of Government. He/she can advise the Speaker to dissolve the House
of Representatives, submit nominations (along with others) for the office
of Speaker to the Constitutional Council, is President of the Federal Executive
Council and decides on the composition of the Cabinet/Ministry.
The Federal Executive Council, which
is headed by the Prime Minister, is the principal organ of the executive
government. It advises the Speaker in respect of the exercise of
certain powers (calling a double dissolution, summoning the Parliament
and convening joint sittings, recommending appropriation bills to Parliament),
establishes departments, appoints public servants and other officers, and
advises the President in respect of the exercise of certain powers.